7

AI OPERATIONS

HOW I BUILD
AI SYSTEMS.

Most people stop at the chatbot. I build seven layers deep — from the specification that defines intent to the cost model that proves ROI. Here's the process, step by step.

01
STEP 01

DEFINE THE SPEC

Every system starts with precision. I define exactly what the agent does and doesn’t do — with edge cases, guardrails, and measurable success criteria. Not “build something to help with support.” More like: handle these ticket types, escalate at this sentiment threshold, log every decision with a reason code. Machines need exactness. I close the gap between what you want and what the agent understands.

02
STEP 02

PROVE IT WORKS

AI is fluently wrong. It produces polished, confident output that sounds correct but isn’t. I build evaluation systems that catch this — automated quality harnesses that test agent output at scale, not manual spot-checks. Simulation runs before deployment. Longitudinal metrics after. If an agent starts drifting, the eval system flags it before a customer ever sees the result.

03
STEP 03

BREAK THE WORK APART

One massive agent is a single point of failure. I decompose work into multi-agent systems where specialized agents handle discrete tasks and hand off cleanly — a research agent feeds a drafting agent feeds an evaluation agent. Each with its own scope, guardrails, and communication protocol. A planner agent orchestrates the sequence. The system is modular, testable, and replaceable at the component level.

04
STEP 04

KNOW HOW IT FAILS

AI fails in specific, recognizable patterns. Context degradation — quality drops as sessions get long. Specification drift — the agent subtly forgets the original intent. Sycophantic confirmation — it agrees with bad data instead of pushing back. Cascading failure — one agent’s mistake amplifies through the chain. Silent failure — plausible output that’s quietly wrong. I build detection for all of them because catching failures is cheaper than cleaning up after them.

05
STEP 05

DESIGN THE TRUST LINE

Where do agents act alone, and where do humans stay in the loop? I map every decision point by blast radius, reversibility, and verification difficulty. Low-stakes, reversible, high-frequency tasks get full autonomy. High-stakes, irreversible, hard-to-verify decisions get human checkpoints. The line isn’t drawn by gut feel — it’s drawn by the math of what happens when things go wrong.

06
STEP 06

ARCHITECT THE CONTEXT

Agents are only as good as the information they have. I design three-tier context systems: persistent knowledge available across all sessions, domain-specific context loaded per agent role, and session-level data pulled dynamically per interaction. I build dirty-data layers that flag stale information and route agents to verified sources. Most AI failures in production aren’t model failures — they’re context failures. I fix that first.

07
STEP 07

MODEL THE COST

Before you spend a dollar, I show you the ROI. Token economics, model routing, blended cost calculations across multi-step workflows. I know when a lighter model handles 80% of the volume at a fraction of the price, and when the premium model is worth the cost for the remaining 20%. Not every task should be automated. I’ll tell you that too — and save you from six-figure mistakes.

SPECIFICATIONEVALUATIONDECOMPOSITIONFAILURE DETECTIONTRUST DESIGNCONTEXT ARCHITECTURECOST MODELINGSPECIFICATIONEVALUATIONDECOMPOSITIONFAILURE DETECTIONTRUST DESIGNCONTEXT ARCHITECTURECOST MODELINGSPECIFICATIONEVALUATIONDECOMPOSITIONFAILURE DETECTIONTRUST DESIGNCONTEXT ARCHITECTURECOST MODELINGSPECIFICATIONEVALUATIONDECOMPOSITIONFAILURE DETECTIONTRUST DESIGNCONTEXT ARCHITECTURECOST MODELING

THE DIFFERENCE

DEMOS ARE
EASY.
PRODUCTION
ISN'T.

Anyone can build an AI demo that works in a meeting. The agent responds, the stakeholders clap, the project gets approved. Then it hits production and quietly falls apart — context degrades, specifications drift, costs spiral, and nobody catches the failures because the output still looks polished.

I build for Tuesday afternoon. The agent that works correctly on its 10,000th run, not just its first. The system that catches its own mistakes. The architecture that scales without the cost scaling with it.

That's not a technology problem. It's a discipline problem. And it's the discipline I've spent $150K and 3,000 hours building.

$150K+

Invested in AI R&D

3,000+

Hours testing & building

300+

AI tools evaluated

6

Industries automated

15+

Production agents deployed

WHERE THIS SHOWS UP

REAL SYSTEMS.
REAL RESULTS.

Confidential (Healthcare)

Multi-agent sales pipeline with evaluation harnesses, trust boundaries, and cost modeling across the full outbound motion.

$6M ARR

Confidential (FinTech)

Multi-agent orchestration for invoicing, reconciliation, and reporting with failure detection for silent errors in financial data.

Full Auto

ELITE

Context architecture for real-time skill verification — persistent credential data, session-level evaluation, and trust-designed verification flows.

Resume 3.0

READY TO
BUILD
FOR REAL?

I take on a max of 2 clients at a time. If you need AI systems that work in production — not just in a demo — let's talk.